Turn a crypto risk signal into an actionable case.
Chain Trace Labs connects source-of-funds review, blockchain investigation, evidence, escalation and ongoing monitoring—so analysts can explain not only that activity was flagged, but what happened and why the next decision is supportable.
Does the observed route require enhanced review?
Assigned
A label is not an investigation.
Compliance teams often need to look beyond a direct wallet match. Intermediate hops, branching paths, service interactions and off-chain context can materially change how a case is understood.
- Go deeper: follow relevant pathways and branches.
- Keep context: connect findings to sources and limitations.
- Make it operational: assign ownership, review and follow-up.
For the cases that need more than screening.
Use the platform as the investigation and evidence layer around higher-touch compliance decisions.
Source-of-funds review
Examine known wallet history and relevant transaction pathways when customer-provided information needs corroboration.
Route history · Entity context · Review narrativeSuspicious activity investigation
Build a fuller record around transactions, branches, counterparties and material risk signals before escalation.
Multi-hop trace · AML/KYT · EvidenceEDD and account review
Organise on-chain findings, OSINT and communications context around an enhanced customer or account review.
Context · Tasks · Decision recordFreeze and disclosure support
Prepare the case record and track authorised service-provider, legal or law-enforcement engagement.
Request packs · Contacts · Follow-upOne loop from alert to action.
Keep intelligence, evidence, ownership and review connected as the matter moves through the team.
Begin with the decision the analyst must make.
Capture the customer, wallets, transactions, trigger, chronology, supporting material and relevant internal question.
- Case intake and priority
- Known identifiers and parties
- Scope, owner and access
Understand the route—not only the endpoint.
Trace relevant fund paths across supported networks and assess entity, exchange, bridge, mixer and other available context.
- Multi-hop and branch tracing
- Wallet screening context
- OSINT and communications
Connect every material finding to its support.
Preserve source material, analyst observations and limitations around a reviewable case and evidence record.
- Evidence Vault
- Source and integrity context
- Reports and evidence schedules
Move the matter through an accountable review.
Assign reviewers, capture rationale and prepare authorised outputs or operational follow-up without presenting the platform as the decision-maker.
- Review gates and tasks
- Case narrative and reports
- Exchange, legal and referral workflows
Keep material movement and deadlines visible.
Continue after the first review with wallet monitoring, case connections, assigned follow-up and relevant alerts.
- Wallet watchlists
- Cross-case correlation
- Tasks and deadline reminders
Keep context intact when the case changes hands.
A compliance investigation may move between screening operations, investigators, MLRO review, legal, external counsel and law enforcement. The supporting record should move with it.
What the next reviewer needs
A compliance investigation operating layer.
Use the modules relevant to the institution’s workflow, users and integration requirements.
Blockchain forensic engine
Multi-chain tracing, wallet context, entity interactions and fraud patterns.
OSINT and communications
Reviewed identity, domain, infrastructure and communication signals.
Case workflow cockpit
Stages, tasks, roles, deadlines, notes and review gates.
Evidence and reporting
Evidence records, findings, schedules and controlled publication.
Exchange and legal action
Service-provider contacts, request workflows, referrals and follow-up.
Monitoring and correlation
Wallet movements, recurring indicators and linked-case intelligence.
Evidence informs policy. It does not replace it.
Chain Trace Labs supports the investigation record while the exchange or institution remains responsible for legal interpretation, risk appetite, reporting obligations and final decisions.
Review our legal and compliance principles ↗Role-aware access
Scope case visibility around authorised users and duties.
Human review
Keep external outputs subject to accountable approval.
Source-aware findings
Separate observed facts, intelligence and inference.
Visible limitations
Record uncertainty rather than concealing it behind a score.
Connect approved hand-offs to your environment.
Use Chain Trace Labs directly as a specialist workspace or scope governed API pathways for structured case intake, authorised status, wallet checks and published reports.
Explore API and integrations →Start with the workflow that needs strengthening.
Fit access and configuration around real review types, roles, volumes, controls and systems.
Discover
Triggers, case types, teams and desired outcomes.
Design
Workflow, permissions, outputs and boundaries.
Validate
Representative cases and operating requirements.
Roll out
Configuration, onboarding and supported adoption.
Clear boundaries before deployment.
No. It provides a connected investigation, evidence and operational workflow for cases that require deeper analysis beyond an initial signal.
No. The platform supports analysis and review. Your authorised team applies institutional policy and makes the final decision.
Yes. Teams can use a controlled workspace directly and scope integrations only where approved hand-offs add value.
Yes. Appropriate wallet monitoring, case links, tasks and follow-up can continue within the authorised matter.
Show us where your compliance investigation slows down.
We will map how Chain Trace Labs can strengthen the investigation, evidence and operational record around your existing controls.
