Before spending time or money on recovery, get an evidence-based assessment of whether your situation presents a realistic recovery, preservation, or escalation path - and what that path may actually involve.
Free initial consultation · No obligation · Evidence-led findings
Many people lose time and money pursuing crypto recovery without first understanding whether their specific situation actually supports a realistic path forward. A recovery feasibility assessment is meant to answer that early.
We review the details of your case - what happened, where funds appear to have moved, which services or destinations were involved, and what evidence exists - and give you a grounded picture of what recovery, preservation, or escalation could look like for your situation.
The point of the assessment is not to raise hopes or shut the door too quickly. It is to give you a clearer picture of the facts, the friction points, and the next-step routes worth considering.
We look at what happened, what funds were involved, and what is known about where they went.
We identify the factors that most strongly predict whether recovery is realistic in your case.
We tell you what routes appear viable, what is uncertain, and what - if anything - is worth doing next.
No two cases are the same. These are the signals we evaluate to form an honest picture of what is achievable in your situation.
If cryptocurrency appears to land at a centralised exchange or another identifiable service, there may be a practical route for preservation, compliance outreach, or later legal action. This is one of the strongest positive feasibility signals.
The sooner action is taken after the incident, the more options usually remain available. Destination accounts are more likely to still be active, monitoring is more useful, and evidence is fresher.
Transaction records, confirmation emails, screenshots, wallet addresses, chat records, and platform names all strengthen the case. More evidence means a clearer trace and a better-supported escalation package.
Where the receiving exchange or service is based affects which escalation routes may be available. Regulated jurisdictions often offer clearer compliance, preservation, or law-enforcement pathways than opaque or lightly supervised environments.
Mixing services are designed to obscure the on-chain trail. Tracing may still produce useful context, but confidence usually drops and escalation becomes more difficult.
If funds have been withdrawn to a bank account or otherwise moved off-chain, blockchain tracing becomes only part of the picture. From that point, recovery depends more heavily on evidence quality, jurisdiction, and follow-on legal or banking routes.
Every feasibility assessment ends with a clear conclusion. The point is not to manufacture confidence; it is to explain what the evidence supports and what level of action makes sense.
Funds are traceable to an identifiable point of control or a meaningful destination, and there appear to be practical compliance, preservation, monitoring, or legal-support options available.
There may be a path, but it is uncertain. We explain the specific conditions that improve or limit the case so you can decide whether further work is justified.
The evidence does not currently support a strong recovery route. We explain why, identify what is missing, and suggest any alternative preservation, reporting, or documentation steps that may still be worthwhile.
Simple, clear, and structured. You share what happened, we review the evidence and tracing context, and we return an assessment that is grounded in the actual case facts.
Describe your situation in plain language - what was lost, when, how, and to what address or platform if you know it. No technical knowledge required. We take it from here.
We look at the on-chain evidence, destination signals, case chronology, and supporting material to build a picture of what your specific situation looks like from the inside out.
We identify any legal, compliance, monitoring, or enforcement routes that appear available - and weigh them against the practical evidence and likely friction in each route.
A written report with a clear assessment outcome, our reasoning, and any recommended next steps. Plain language, documented findings, and no false promises.
The written assessment is meant to help you understand your position, the strength of the evidence, and which next-step routes are worth considering.
An action-path conclusion with the reasoning behind it, including caveats where the case is still uncertain.
Where funds appear to have moved, what services or endpoints they interacted with, and what the on-chain record currently supports.
A clear explanation of which signals support, weaken, or complicate a meaningful next-step route in your case.
Specific actions such as reporting, monitoring, exchange outreach preparation, or legal-support escalation, each framed with realistic expectations.
The report is formatted so it can be used with legal counsel, law enforcement, insurers, exchange teams, or internal firm workflows.
The strongest positive indicators are usually a clear transaction trail, documented evidence, rapid reporting, and exposure to a known exchange or service. The more of these are present, the more practical the next-step route tends to become.
Mixing services make tracing harder but not always impossible. The assessment will tell you whether the mixing in your case is a major barrier, whether useful destination context still exists, and whether further work is justified.
Not directly - the on-chain evidence is what matters most, not the amount. However, the economics of legal recovery action do become more relevant for smaller amounts, and we will be upfront about this if it affects our recommendations.
Timing varies with case complexity, evidence quality, and the number of chains or endpoints involved. Straightforward matters are quicker; multi-chain, mixer, or cross-border cases usually take longer.
We will still explain what we found, why the case is weak, and what can still be preserved or documented. In some matters, reporting, monitoring, or holding a documented record may still be worthwhile even when immediate recovery is not.
Yes. The report is designed to be shareable and can support discussions with legal counsel, law enforcement, insurers, exchange compliance teams, or any other party involved in the case.
A feasibility assessment gives you a clearer understanding of the facts before committing to tracing, escalation, or recovery work. Free to start, with no obligation to continue.
Request a Feasibility Assessment